261 N.W. 866
No. 30,419.Supreme Court of Minnesota.
July 5, 1935.
Case followed.
Mandamus in the district court for Le Sueur county upon the relation of the city of New Prague and Thomas F. Rybak as city treasurer, directed to the county of Le Sueur, its auditor and treasurer. There were findings for respondents, Fred W. Senn, judge of the fifth judicial district acting for the judge of the eighth judicial district, and relators appealed from the judgment entered. Affirmed, following State ex rel. City of New Prague v. County of Scott, 195 Minn. 111, 261 N.W. 863.
Clarence O. Fehling, City Attorney, and Arthur J. Phil Jelinek, for appellants (relators below).
George T. Havel, County Attorney, and Gallagher, Madden Gallagher, for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
This case was argued and submitted with the companion case of the same parties appellants against Scott county and its auditor and treasurer. The decision in the Scott county case, State ex rel. City of New Prague v. County of Scott, 195 Minn. 111, 261 N.W. 863, filed herewith, controls this case and is here followed and applied.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Page 120
Old Republic Surety Company, Respondent, v. Weinerman and Associates LLC, Defendant, Mark Bugni, et al.,…
40 Minn. 103 Supreme Court of Minnesota. OSBORNE v. MCMASTERS. Jan. 30, 1889. Syllabus 1. *103 Where…
109 Minn. 456 Supreme Court of Minnesota. VINCENT et al. v. LAKE ERIE TRANSP. CO.…
Van Pao Thao, petitioner, Appellant, v. State of Minnesota, Respondent. No. A07-2137.Minnesota Court of Appeals.…
Christopher Andrew Hondl, petitioner, Appellant, v. State of Minnesota, Respondent. No. A06-464.Minnesota Court of Appeals.…
State of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Alejandro Perez Calel, Appellant. No. A07-1882.Minnesota Court of Appeals. Filed…