No. A10-897.Supreme Court of Minnesota.
August 25, 2010.
Mark F. Gaughan, Caroline Bell Beckman, Erickson, Bell, Beckman Quinn, P.A., Roseville, MN, for respondent.
Thomas J. Miller, Minneapolis City Attorney’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, for relator.
Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 20, 2010, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.
BY THE COURT:
/s/Paul H. Anderson
Associate Justice
Old Republic Surety Company, Respondent, v. Weinerman and Associates LLC, Defendant, Mark Bugni, et al.,…
40 Minn. 103 Supreme Court of Minnesota. OSBORNE v. MCMASTERS. Jan. 30, 1889. Syllabus 1. *103 Where…
109 Minn. 456 Supreme Court of Minnesota. VINCENT et al. v. LAKE ERIE TRANSP. CO.…
Van Pao Thao, petitioner, Appellant, v. State of Minnesota, Respondent. No. A07-2137.Minnesota Court of Appeals.…
Christopher Andrew Hondl, petitioner, Appellant, v. State of Minnesota, Respondent. No. A06-464.Minnesota Court of Appeals.…
State of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Alejandro Perez Calel, Appellant. No. A07-1882.Minnesota Court of Appeals. Filed…