215 N.W. 180
No. 26,132.Supreme Court of Minnesota.
July 22, 1927.
Case followed.
Plaintiff appealed from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Kenny, J., sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. Reversed, following Marble v. Oliver I. Min. Co. supra, p. 263.
A.L. Agatin, for appellant.
Frank D. Adams, Elmer F. Blu, Cleon Headley, George W. Morgan, and Davis, Severance Morgan, for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The covenant sued on is practically the same as in the Marble case, supra, p. 263, reading: “The lessee agrees to pay all taxes and assessments, ordinary or extraordinary, general and specific, upon the land so demised which may be assessed either against said lands and the improvements thereon, or the iron ore product thereof or any personal property at said mines from and after the first day of January, A.D. 1902, during the continuation of this lease.”
On the authority of the Marble case the order is reversed.
Page 273
Old Republic Surety Company, Respondent, v. Weinerman and Associates LLC, Defendant, Mark Bugni, et al.,…
40 Minn. 103 Supreme Court of Minnesota. OSBORNE v. MCMASTERS. Jan. 30, 1889. Syllabus 1. *103 Where…
109 Minn. 456 Supreme Court of Minnesota. VINCENT et al. v. LAKE ERIE TRANSP. CO.…
Van Pao Thao, petitioner, Appellant, v. State of Minnesota, Respondent. No. A07-2137.Minnesota Court of Appeals.…
Christopher Andrew Hondl, petitioner, Appellant, v. State of Minnesota, Respondent. No. A06-464.Minnesota Court of Appeals.…
State of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Alejandro Perez Calel, Appellant. No. A07-1882.Minnesota Court of Appeals. Filed…